Generational Differences Revisited

The so-called “generational divide” in the workplace between Boomers and Millennials continues to draw fatique-level copy in the popular business press. It’s significance grossly over-spun, (see earlier Cenek Report post), some refreshing balance has been injected into the ongoing dialogue by two reputable business organizations.

The highly esteemed Gallup organization published survey findings in its March 2008 edition of Management Journal strongly indicating that all workers want the same things from their work. Similarly, Robert Half International issued a press release reporting that Millennials, like Boomers, share similar concerns, such as saving for retirement, having decent medical insurance, and achieving work-life balance. According to Half, they also expect lots from their leaders – and see them as partners in success and job satisfaction.

Pitching the notion of generational differences is a killer revenue generator for the most enterprising authors and consulting organizations. As Harry Levinson, formerly of the Levinson Institute and Harvard University, often remarked, many people in the world of work yearn for simplistic (but inherently incomplete) prescriptions for dealing with complicated behavior in the workplace. They believe, but mistakenly so, that it provides order and explanation to the unpredictable patterns of human behavior that swirl in all work environments. Nothing else more powerfully explains the large commercial success of the One Minute Manager – or the fabulously entertaining Morris Massey tapes that all training and development departments in the 1970’s could count on to salvage reactionaire scores.

By the way, one of the better articles on the topic was penned by Frank Giancola, and appeared in a past issue of Human Resource Planning.

More scholarly research is needed on the topic. To date, most of the discussion about generational differences is based on speculation, weak polling, and anecdotal evidence.